From 75dfe7c566c36e0af4714557a666827f49b69191 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:31:28 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] livepatch: Wrong usage of spinlock on debug console.

If we have a large amount of livepatches and want to print them
on the console using 'xl debug-keys x' we eventually hit
the preemption check:

  if ( i && !(i % 64) )
  {
	spin_unlock(&payload_lock);
	process_pending_softirqs();
	if ( spin_trylock(&payload_lock) )
		return

<facepalm> The effect is that we have just effectively
taken the lock and returned without unlocking!

Reviewed-by: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Release-acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
---
 xen/common/livepatch.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xen/common/livepatch.c b/xen/common/livepatch.c
index f14bcbc8cd..df67a1aa2c 100644
--- a/xen/common/livepatch.c
+++ b/xen/common/livepatch.c
@@ -1642,7 +1642,7 @@ static void livepatch_printall(unsigned char key)
             {
                 spin_unlock(&payload_lock);
                 process_pending_softirqs();
-                if ( spin_trylock(&payload_lock) )
+                if ( !spin_trylock(&payload_lock) )
                 {
                     printk("Couldn't reacquire lock. Try again.\n");
                     return;
-- 
2.30.2